jakebelder.com -
« Back to blog

The Preacher is Not a Free Man

John Stott is well-known for his advocacy of expository preaching. In his book, Between Two Worlds, he says that to "expound Scripture is to bring out of the text what is there and expose it to view. The expositor prizes open what appears to be closed, makes plain what is obscure, unravels what is knotted, and unfolds what is tightly packed." The intent of such preaching is nothing more than setting forth the truth of Scripture in a manner that is plain – and excuse the buzzwords  – relevant and applicable.

Stott goes on in his book to set out what he feels are some of the strongest arguments for expository preaching, one of which is the recognition that exposition imposes limits upon the preacher. He writes,

It restricts us to the scriptural text, since expository preaching is biblical preaching. We are not expounding a passage from either secular literature or a political speech or even a religious book, let alone our own opinions. No, our text is invariably taken from God's Word. The very first qualification of expositors is the recognition that we are guardians of a sacred 'deposit' of truth, 'trustees' of the gospel, 'stewards of the mysteries of God.'

Not many people like the idea of being confined by something, or being limited by something external to themselves, but when it comes to preaching, there really is no other option if we are to faithfully proclaim the truth of Scripture. Stott quotes Donald Coggan, the former Archbishop of Canterbury, who noted that it was, in fact, a joy to be confined as a preacher by the Word of God:

The Christian preacher has a boundary set for him. When he enters the pulpit, he is not an entirely free man. There is a very real sense in which it may be said of him that the Almighty has set him his bounds that he shall not pass. He is not at liberty to invent or choose his message: it has been committed to him, and it is for him to declare, expound and commend it to his hearers... It is a great thing to come under the magnificent tyranny of the Gospel!

I quite like that, the "tyranny of the Gospel." It is, indeed, an absolute authority that we come under when we submit ourselves to Lordship of Jesus Christ and his Word. It demands our complete and unfailing loyalty. But yet it is under that authority that we find the most faithful and the most powerful preaching.

Comments (4)

Jul 08, 2010
dave b said...
hi Jake. interesting post. based on your seminary training how exactly would you define expository preaching.

one of the leaders of my church has been putting on a preaching class for about a dozen people in our church and we all had to prepare and deliver a sermon...so having done so and in light of another project I'm working on which is about being attuned to hear God's word in the OT today I've been thinking a lot about interpretation and preaching. It just has really struck me that there is a BIG difference between understanding the text, it's background, contexts, etc.--the message of the text to the original audience--(I guess this would be exegesis) and actually hearing God's message for his people and the world today. I think the later requires knowing well people and the culture(s) in which the church is as much as having a good understanding of Scripture.

Jul 09, 2010
david said...
you must have been reading Darrel Johnson lately.... :)
Jul 09, 2010
Jake Belder said...
Thanks, Dave. I've seen a few articles and things lately on what expository preaching actually is and what it's pros and cons are (see, for example, this recent piece by Iain Murray). What's clear is that expository preaching is often miscontrued as just preaching systematically through a book of the Bible, but a more acceptable definition seems to be what Stott is saying here (and I think I would agree), and even like what you are saying, incorporating understanding the background to the text, it's original meaning, and how it applies to the people in the pew. It is certainly no small task!
Jul 09, 2010
Jake Belder said...
David, I have not read anything by Darrell Johnson, at least that I can recall.

Leave a comment...